<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What would an expert want with recipes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://notes.dpdx.net/2006/05/23/what-would-an-expert-want-with-recipes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://notes.dpdx.net/2006/05/23/what-would-an-expert-want-with-recipes/</link>
	<description>Fluid Dynamics, Computer Simulations, and Assorted Tinkering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:24:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TWAndrews</title>
		<link>http://notes.dpdx.net/2006/05/23/what-would-an-expert-want-with-recipes/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>TWAndrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 18:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notes.dpdx.net/2006/05/23/what-would-an-expert-want-with-recipes/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I still think that there&#039;s a lot of value in having recipes.  It may be that they&#039;re not much good for experts (except, as you mention, as sources of data), but they&#039;re still quite valueable simply because they let newbies get started.

This has always been the problem which I&#039;ve had with &lt;a&gt;Joel&#039;s&lt;/a&gt; thoughts regarding expert vs. non-expert programmers.  While he&#039;s entirely correct that experts, left more or less to their own devices will produce breathtaking programs, the fact is that there&#039;s a lot more code to be written than there are expert programers to write it.

So to me the more interesting question isn&#039;t &quot;How do I let expert programers produce their best work?&quot; but rather &quot;How can one effectively combine experts and novices to get sub-optimal, but still servicable programs for reasonable cost in a limited timeframe?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think that there&#8217;s a lot of value in having recipes.  It may be that they&#8217;re not much good for experts (except, as you mention, as sources of data), but they&#8217;re still quite valueable simply because they let newbies get started.</p>
<p>This has always been the problem which I&#8217;ve had with <a>Joel&#8217;s</a> thoughts regarding expert vs. non-expert programmers.  While he&#8217;s entirely correct that experts, left more or less to their own devices will produce breathtaking programs, the fact is that there&#8217;s a lot more code to be written than there are expert programers to write it.</p>
<p>So to me the more interesting question isn&#8217;t &#8220;How do I let expert programers produce their best work?&#8221; but rather &#8220;How can one effectively combine experts and novices to get sub-optimal, but still servicable programs for reasonable cost in a limited timeframe?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Atwood</title>
		<link>http://notes.dpdx.net/2006/05/23/what-would-an-expert-want-with-recipes/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Atwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 00:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notes.dpdx.net/2006/05/23/what-would-an-expert-want-with-recipes/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Nice example -- that&#039;s the kind of expert cooking I was thinking of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice example &#8212; that&#8217;s the kind of expert cooking I was thinking of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
