<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brooks Moses: Notes on Divergent Simulations &#187; Academia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://notes.dpdx.net/category/academia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://notes.dpdx.net</link>
	<description>Fluid Dynamics, Computer Simulations, and Assorted Tinkering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 05:23:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Customer Support Fun with Academic Journals</title>
		<link>http://notes.dpdx.net/2007/01/09/customer-support-fun-with-academic-journals/</link>
		<comments>http://notes.dpdx.net/2007/01/09/customer-support-fun-with-academic-journals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brooks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notes.dpdx.net/2007/01/09/customer-support-fun-with-academic-journals/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been spending most of today catching up on a huge backlog of journal citation alerts and downloading the relevant articles to read before I start writing the &#8220;other work&#8221; section of my dissertation in the next week or two.  So I&#8217;ve been noticing a few things about the websites of various journal publishers.
One [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been spending most of today catching up on a huge backlog of journal citation alerts and downloading the relevant articles to read before I start writing the &#8220;other work&#8221; section of my dissertation in the next week or two.  So I&#8217;ve been noticing a few things about the websites of various journal publishers.</p>
<p>One of the things that I&#8217;ve noticed is how different websites handle feedback from their customers—and, in particular, bug reports (and feature requests).</p>
<p>For example, the <a href="http://scitation.aip.org/pre/help.jsp">American Institute of Physics</a> has direct links to an online &#8220;submit query&#8221; form directly off their help page, and also has a prominently-featured email address—which was quite useful, since I got a server error when I tried to use the online form.  We&#8217;ll see how quickly they reply (if they do; bug reports don&#8217;t really need replies), but in my opinion, that page is pretty much how things should be.  It would be nice if they had an explicit mention of &#8220;bug reports go here&#8221;, but &#8220;Technical Support Query Form&#8221; is close enough.</p>
<p>Contrast this with the <a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/contactus.html">Wiley &#8220;Contact Us&#8221; page</a>, which I&#8217;ve been dealing with for the past fifteen minutes or so.  Why have I been dealing with it for fifteen minutes, for what started out as a trivial feature request?  Well, first off, at the bottom of the <a href="http://interscience.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/interscience.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=3648">How To Contact Customer Support</a> page (yes, that&#8217;s a different page, which you get to by clicking a link on the &#8220;Contact Us&#8221; page), it says, &#8220;We regret that Wiley InterScience Customer Support does not accept queries by email.&#8221;  That, of course, means that the only option to actually say anything to them is through their web system, regardless of whether or not it happens to be broken.</p>
<p>So, consider the web form.  That &#8220;Contact Us&#8221; page has a couple of links to customer support: one labeled &#8220;Online Customer Support&#8221; promising FAQs and so forth, and one labeled &#8220;Contact Customer Support&#8221; and noting that one should use it if &#8220;unable to log in&#8221;.  Despite the appearance of being different things, they both go to the same page, which is a <a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/rightnow">login form</a>, with a place to register an account in the fine print at the bottom.  Now, I don&#8217;t have a personal account here, since I&#8217;m using a university site license for the content, so it looks like they&#8217;re asking me to go through the whole process of creating an account on the site <em>just to file a simple bug report</em>.</p>
<p>Eventually I noticed, down at the fine print on the bottom of that page, the link for &#8220;if you don&#8217;t want to register, click here&#8221;.  Good.  No, I don&#8217;t want to register; I want to file a bug report and be done with that.</p>
<p>That gets me to the main customer service web page, which then has a link to &#8220;Ask A Question&#8221;.  It does not have a link to &#8220;File a Bug Report&#8221;, or to &#8220;Make a Feature Request&#8221;, or to anything at all which would be an appropriate phrasing for any problem that would require them to do anything whatsoever about it, but that sort of implicit assumption that it&#8217;s the customer&#8217;s problem seems to be the style these days, so I dutifully clicked on the &#8220;Ask A Question&#8221; link, and got presented with a web form.</p>
<p>This web form has a fair bit of clever Javascript to make my life &#8220;easier&#8221;, so that depending on which options I click for my problem, different subcategory boxes appear.  Once I&#8217;ve got them all filled in, a box pops up for me to select my regional location and enter my institution.  (Apparently it&#8217;s a barter system; I have to trade demographic information to them before they&#8217;ll answer my &#8220;question&#8221;.)  Except that this doesn&#8217;t actually work in the version of Opera that I use, so the &#8220;Location&#8221; box never appears, which means that the &#8220;Error: You didn&#8217;t enter a location&#8221; message that I got when I tried to submit the form was really quite cryptic.  And rather hard to work around, too, until I decoded it to &#8220;Error: We don&#8217;t support your browser,&#8221; and tried Mozilla, in which the Javascript works a little better.</p>
<p>Once I entered the question and clicked submit, I still wasn&#8217;t done.  First, there was the little matter that since I hadn&#8217;t registered before, they wanted me to do so now, and were presenting me with the registration form to fill out.  I gave in and gave them a password to associate with my email address and the other information they wanted, and again clicked submit.</p>
<p>And, again, I still wasn&#8217;t done, because that gave me a page along the lines of &#8220;We&#8217;ve selected five answers from our FAQ that our <a href="http://www.google.com/technology/pigeonrank.html">pigeons</a> think may have something to do with your question.  Do any of them answer it?  If not, please scroll down a screen and click the &#8216;No, these don&#8217;t answer my question&#8217; link at the bottom of the page.&#8221;  Of course the FAQ answers don&#8217;t answer my question; it&#8217;s a bug report, and it needs someone on <em>your end</em> to do something about it.  (This is <em>why</em> I am annoyed with customer service websites that phrase things as &#8220;ask a question&#8221; rather than &#8220;contact customer support&#8221;; it seems that it&#8217;s a short jump from there to setting up the whole process as if the only things the site has to deal with are questions.)</p>
<p>At this point, it finally accepted the question, gave me a tracking number, and told me that I should expect a reply in 24 hours.  We shall see.</p>
<p>So, let&#8217;s recap on why this matters (beyond the obvious bug report).  A good-sized chunk of my dissertation is going to get reworked into a journal paper or two, and both AIP and Wiley publish journals that would be good places to submit it.  One publisher&#8217;s customer-service site is a clear, simple, single-page website with a no-javascript online form and a prominently-placed email address.  The other publisher&#8217;s customer service site comes with its own <a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/aboutus/sharedfiles/wis_support_flyer.pdf">650kb(!) user manual in PDF form</a> and makes it a 15-minute complicated web maze to file a trivial bug report.  So, whose paper-submission process would I be likely to want to deal with?</p>
<p><strong>Edited to add:</strong> I got an emailed reply to all three messages to Wiley, within four hours of submitting the questions.  It was polite and clearly from a human being, and made it clear that my initial feature request was noted and relates to things they are currently working on.  It was slightly off-putting that the response to my bug report about the web form was essentially &#8220;We&#8217;ve tested this on all current browser versions, and recommend upgrading your browser&#8221; (rather than something like &#8220;Sorry about that; I&#8217;ll let our web team know, though it may be low-priority for them since it&#8217;s not an up-to-date browser&#8221;), but other than that, the message was responsive and prompt, and seemed to involve at least as much thought and consideration as I&#8217;d put into the messages I&#8217;d sent.  There&#8217;s more to customer service than just the website!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://notes.dpdx.net/2007/01/09/customer-support-fun-with-academic-journals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
